# @repo/core-testing

Shared testing utilities. Tag: `tooling`. May be depended on by any package as a devDependency.

## Subpath exports

- `@repo/core-testing/factory` — `defineFactory<T>(builder)` for test data factories
- `@repo/core-testing/contract` — `defineContractSuite<T>(name, suite)` for cross-impl contract tests
- `@repo/core-testing/react` — `renderWithProviders`, `createMockTrpcClient`
  - `renderWithProviders` does NOT include a tRPC provider. Consumers needing tRPC should wire their own TRPCProvider (from their app's tRPC client setup) and use `createMockTrpcClient` as the client. This constraint exists because tooling packages cannot import `AppRouter` from `@repo/core-api`.
- `@repo/core-testing/payload` — `stubPayloadConfig`, `mockPayloadModule`
- `@repo/core-testing/setup/jsdom` — vitest setupFile (jest-dom + cleanup)
- `@repo/core-testing/setup/node` — vitest setupFile (no-op placeholder)

## Adding a factory

```typescript
import { defineFactory } from "@repo/core-testing/factory";

export const articleFactory = defineFactory<Article>(({ sequence }) => ({
  id: `article-${sequence}`,
  title: `Article ${sequence}`,
  // stable defaults — overrides drive variation
}));
```

## Using createMockTrpcClient

For component tests that consume tRPC procedures, mock the responses by procedure path (dot-separated):

```typescript
import { createMockTrpcClient } from "@repo/core-testing/react";
import type { AppRouter } from "@repo/core-api"; // import in your app/feature, not in core-testing

const trpcClient = createMockTrpcClient<AppRouter>({
  "blog.articleBySlug": { id: "1", title: "Hello", slug: "hello" },
  "blog.listArticles": [],
});
```

Combine with your app's TRPCProvider for components that need a tRPC client in the render tree.

## Adding a contract suite

See `docs/guides/tdd-workflow.md` §"Contract suite usage".

## Plan 9 test patterns

These test obligations apply to every feature package. The examples below show the minimal shape — adapt to the feature's actual types.

### R25 — Output validation (use case)

Every non-void use case must have a test that injects a mock returning malformed data and asserts the use case rejects with a `ZodError`. This proves `xOutputSchema.parse(result)` is actually called.

```typescript
it("throws ZodError when repository returns malformed data (R25)", async () => {
  const badRepo = { getArticleBySlug: async () => ({ id: 1 }) }; // id should be string
  await expect(getArticleBySlugUseCase(badRepo as any)({ slug: "x" }))
    .rejects.toBeInstanceOf(ZodError);
});
```

Void use cases (`signOut`, `deleteMedia`) are exempt — they have no `xOutputSchema`.

### R26 — Router error mapping (tRPC)

Each feature's `router.test.ts` must assert the correct `TRPCError.code` for at least one mapped domain error, using `xRouter.createCaller({})`.

```typescript
it("returns NOT_FOUND when article is missing (R26)", async () => {
  const caller = blogRouter.createCaller({});
  const error = await caller.articleBySlug({ slug: "missing" }).catch((e) => e);
  expect(error).toBeInstanceOf(TRPCError);
  expect(error.code).toBe("NOT_FOUND");
});
```

Also assert `BAD_REQUEST` for at least one invalid-input call (exercises the `strict()` schema boundary).

### R27/R28 — Presenter shape (controller tests)

When a controller's presenter reshapes the use-case output (e.g., `signInController` extracts `cookie` from `{ session, cookie }`), the controller test must assert against the **view shape**, not the use-case output shape.

```typescript
// signInController: presenter returns value.cookie (a Cookie object)
const result = await signInController(mockUseCase)({ username: "u", password: "p" });
expect(result.name).toBe(SESSION_COOKIE);   // Cookie.name
expect(result.value).toBeDefined();         // Cookie.value
// NOT: expect(result.session).toBeDefined() — that's the use-case output, not the view
```

Identity presenters (`return value;`) skip this obligation — the view shape equals the use-case output shape.
