fraqtal/agentic-dev
Template
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions 1 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

docs(work): archive shipped template epics and PRDs

Browse Source 
Move the 8 shipped template epics and their 9 PRDs (incl.
coverage-architecture) to docs/work/archive/{epics,prds}/ so dispatch
context and prioritization only see live Veect work. The state builder
already walks docs/work/epics/ + docs/work/prds/ only; the one work-CLI
script that matched archive paths (bump-updated-timestamps.mjs, staged
docs/work/**/*.md) now excludes docs/work/archive/ so archived content
stays byte-identical.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016j8z4VHjedXDTjEDNg7qHK
This commit is contained in:
Danijel Martinek
2026-07-12 17:28:21 +02:00
parent 2126fda6f8
commit 2b39ae8c0a
86 changed files with 5 additions and 757 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

43
docs/work/archive/epics/library-evaluation-policy/06-sandcastle-reviewer-prompt/_story.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
---
id: 06-sandcastle-reviewer-prompt
epic: library-evaluation-policy
title: Sandcastle reviewer prompt — Library-trace check section
type: technical-story
status: done
feature: tooling
depends-on: [02-pre-commit-check-script]
blocks: []
created: 2026-05-14T06:52:02+02:00
updated: 2026-05-14T19:21:52.308Z
---
## Goal
Append a "Library-trace check" section to `.sandcastle/reviewer.prompt.md` instructing the reviewer agent to run `node scripts/library-decisions/check.mjs --staged-against <base>` before issuing its verdict, and add the `--staged-against <base>` flag to `check.mjs` so it can compare against a given base ref rather than only the git index.
## Why
The sandcastle reviewer runs in a clean sandbox where `git diff --cached` may not reflect the full branch diff. The `--staged-against <base>` flag allows the reviewer to pass the PR's base branch as the comparison point, giving the same check a CI-compatible code path. Without this, the fourth enforcement layer is advisory only — it has no mechanical check to back it up.
## Done when
- `scripts/library-decisions/check.mjs` accepts a `--staged-against <base>` flag; when present, compares `git diff <base>...HEAD -- '**/package.json'` instead of `git diff --cached`.
- `check.test.mjs` has a new test case: `--staged-against main` mode with a new feature-tier dep and no trace → exit 1.
- `.sandcastle/reviewer.prompt.md` contains a "Library-trace check" section (appended, not replacing existing content) instructing the reviewer to run `node scripts/library-decisions/check.mjs --staged-against <base-branch>` and reject the slice if it exits non-zero.
- `pnpm lint && pnpm test && pnpm fallow:audit && pnpm coverage:diff` all pass.
## In scope
- `scripts/library-decisions/check.mjs` — add `--staged-against` flag.
- `scripts/library-decisions/check.test.mjs` — add test for the new flag.
- `.sandcastle/reviewer.prompt.md` — append the Library-trace check section.
## Out of scope
- Changing the reviewer prompt's existing sections.
- The pre-commit (index-mode) check behavior — already in Story 02.
- CI integration (GitHub Actions) — deferred.
## Tasks
- [x] Add `--staged-against <base>` flag to `check.mjs` (switches from `git diff --cached` to `git diff <base>...HEAD`); add a test covering `--staged-against` mode (temp git repo fixture, new feature-tier dep, no trace → exit 1); append "Library-trace check" section to `.sandcastle/reviewer.prompt.md` with the `node scripts/library-decisions/check.mjs --staged-against <base>` invocation and reject instruction; all gates pass on this single commit.