docs: reflect tooling-package rename + Turbo boundaries enforcement

- Rename eslint-config → core-eslint, typescript-config → core-typescript
  in all docs (package map, AGENTS.md, overview.md, dependency-flow.md, etc.)
- Document the five-tag model (app, feature, core, core-composition,
  tooling) — refinement of ADR-006's three-tag mention
- Document core-trpc's core-composition tag (transitively reaches features
  through core-api's AppRouter type)
- Note Turborepo boundaries as a second enforcement layer alongside ESLint
- Add ADR-010 explaining the two-layer enforcement decision and
  five-tag refinement

Files updated:
- docs/architecture/overview.md: package map, enforcement layers, five-tag section
- docs/architecture/dependency-flow.md: boundary rules, enforcement strategy
- docs/architecture/vertical-feature-spec.md: package names, five-tag model
- AGENTS.md: package map, boundary rules, commands
- CLAUDE.md: tooling package names, quick-start command
- packages/core-eslint/AGENTS.md: tag clarification
- packages/core-typescript/AGENTS.md: tag clarification
- packages/core-api/AGENTS.md: core-composition tag
- packages/core-cms/AGENTS.md: core-composition tag
- packages/core-trpc/AGENTS.md: core-composition tag + rationale
- docs/decisions/adr-010-turbo-boundaries.md: new ADR

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-05-05 12:24:04 +02:00
parent eb55a698f3
commit 2c2375920f
11 changed files with 252 additions and 71 deletions

View File

@@ -21,13 +21,16 @@
| shared | | | | |
+--------+ +-----------+ +----------------+
Boundary rules (enforced by eslint-plugin-boundaries):
app → app, core, feature, core-composition (any)
feature → core (any), but NOT other features, NOT app
core → core, but NOT feature, NOT app
core-composition → core, feature subpath exports only (`/cms`, `/api`)
core-api → @repo/<feature>/api
core-cms → @repo/<feature>/cms
Boundary rules (enforced by ESLint + Turborepo boundaries):
app → app, core, core-composition, feature, tooling
feature → core, tooling
core → core, core-composition, tooling
core-composition → core, core-composition, feature, tooling
tooling → tooling
Composition exceptions:
core-api → @repo/<feature>/api (subpath only)
core-cms → @repo/<feature>/cms (subpath only)
```
## Concrete examples
@@ -65,6 +68,14 @@ import { blogRouter } from "@repo/blog/api"; // ❌ core → feature
import { someBlogThing } from "@repo/blog"; // ❌ core → feature (only core-api/core-cms have exception)
```
## Three-layer enforcement
## Enforcement strategy
ESLint catches accidental cross-package imports at lint time. The `package.json` `exports` map blocks deep imports at module-resolution time. Workspace `dependencies` declarations make the package graph itself the source of truth — if you didn't declare it, you can't import it.
Three layers work in tandem:
1. **`package.json` dependencies** — if you didn't declare it, you can't import it
2. **`exports` map** — blocks deep imports; only public subpaths are accessible
3. **Two parallel automated checks** (both enforcing the same five-tag model):
- **ESLint `eslint-plugin-boundaries`** runs at lint time, catching direct-import violations
- **Turborepo `boundaries`** runs at build time, validating the entire workspace graph including transitive dependencies
The two enforcement layers are independent but complementary. ESLint is stricter on per-import context (e.g., file-specific exemptions via `// @boundaries-ignore`), while Turborepo catches transitive issues that lint-time checking misses. Run `pnpm lint` and `pnpm turbo boundaries` in CI to catch all violations.