Bring docs/architecture/ in line with the current repo:
- feature-conformance-explainer.html: drop the "proposed / not yet
implemented" framing — the system is shipped. Four enforcement points
become five (adds `pnpm fallow` as the whole-codebase audit). Manifest
playground shows `coverage`, `analyticsEvents`, `rateLimit`,
`requiresConsent`. Milestone / anchor / open-question sections kept
but marked historical.
- agent-first-workflow-and-conformance.md: four → five enforcement
layers; layer table gains the Fallow row.
- di-explainer.html: bind-production sample rewritten to show
wireUseCase() + assertFeatureConformance() + the full wrapper stack
(span → capture → audit? → analytics? → consent? → rateLimit?).
- data-flow-explainer.html: same bind-production refresh for the
data-flow narrative.
- audit-and-compliance-explainer.html: AuditAction enum 6 → 10 values
(CONSENT_GRANT / WITHDRAW / RESTRICT / UNRESTRICT);
BindProductionContext example gains analytics, consentFactory,
rateLimit.
- vertical-feature-spec.md: §5 layout lists the 8 optional cores plus
core-testing; §9.5 hedges the turbo.json snippet against the live
file; §10.4 drops the dated "360 tests" metric for the ADR-020
coverage architecture; §11 gains a historical lead-in pointing at
docs/decisions/ as the canonical 25-ADR set.
Closes the last two staleness threads from the docs audit:
1. data-flow-explainer.html had four "Plan-9" / "post-Plan-9"
references in the masthead, lede, fix-up bullet, and bindDevSeed
blurb. Stripped — the architecture is now just "vertical-feature".
No content changes beyond the noun rename.
2. audit-and-compliance-explainer.html had a footer link to
../superpowers/specs/2026-05-11-audit-and-compliance-design.md
(archived to .archive/ earlier). Replaced with a link to
ADR-018, which is the durable design record.
3. data-flow-explainer.html + di-explainer.html were inter-linked
with audit + conformance explainers, but had no markdown entry
point — they were orphans from any guide or architecture doc.
architecture/overview.md gains a new "Interactive explainers"
section listing all four single-file HTML walkthroughs with one
sentence each, so they're discoverable from the documented
entry point. The four pages already cross-link to each other.
Final state (verified by repo-wide grep): zero "Plan-N" / "Phase-N"
/ "docs/superpowers/" references in docs/ (excluding .archive/ which
is gitignored). Legitimate `superpowers:brainstorming` skill refs
in agent-first-workflow-and-conformance.md are preserved — those
reference an external plugin, not a repo path.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Rename docs/decisions/adr-012-lazar-conformance.md → adr-012-feature-conventions.md
- Strip "Lazar", "Plan 8/9/10/11", "refactor-logs" refs from all ADRs,
architecture docs, HTML explainers, and feature/core AGENTS.md files
- Update all incoming links in docs/, packages/*/AGENTS.md, HTML explainers
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- AGENTS.md (root): marks core-ui as optional in the package table and
boundary rules; points per-package docs to the .hbs template
- apps/storybook/AGENTS.md: rewrites around no-core-ui-by-default;
stories glob and globals.css import described as post-scaffold steps
- apps/web-next/AGENTS.md: cross-reference updated to template file
- apps/web-tanstack/AGENTS.md: cross-reference updated to template file
- docs/architecture/data-flow-explainer.html: core-ui bullet notes
optional status + generator command
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- ADR-015: Status → Optional with scaffold command + behavior note (bus absent
means no-op, IJobQueue unaffected)
- events-and-jobs.md: prerequisite callout block explaining core-events is
optional, how to scaffold, and which features require it
- data-flow-explainer.html: note bus is optional in BindProductionContext blurb;
add inline comment in code snippet that bus is scaffoldable
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
di-explainer and data-flow-explainer narratives still showed the
pre-ADR-014 1-arg bindProductionBlog(config) form. Updated both
explainers to (config, tracer, logger, bus, queue), and adjusted the
narrative arc so the production-swap step mentions the
resolveEventsAndJobs* preamble.
adding-a-feature's Step 16 sketch was the same 1-arg shape; replaced
with the canonical 5-arg signature and a short note that the bus/queue
params are accept-and-forward until gen event consume / gen job
generators inject usage at the anchors. Pointer to a real feature's
bind-production.ts for the complete reference.
Final sweep is clean — no stale (container, config) or 1-arg
bindProduction signatures remain in docs/.
The .trace-tree blocks I added in §06 / §08 used var(--ink-2) (#5b4a3c —
medium brown), which clashed with the page's dedicated --code-bg
(#16110d, deep dark). Switched to --code-bg + --code-paper for text,
plus the same border + inset/drop shadow as pre.code, so the new blocks
read consistently with every other code block on the page.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
After the user pushed back on intent-vs-shipped state, I greped each layer
and updated both explainers to reflect actual code, not documented intent.
data-flow-explainer.html §06 — "Tracing & error capture":
- New "Where instrumentation actually lives" table — per-layer breakdown
of inline span / inline capture / composed-via-wrapper, with a verifiable
grep showing only repos have inline calls.
- New "The wrapper sandwich" code block showing the actual repo body
shape next to the bind-time withSpan(withCapture(...)) composition.
- Capture-rules table refined to reflect the R44 fix that just landed:
use cases capture business-rule errors and output-schema failures
(not bubbled-from-repo); controllers capture safeParse failures
(not bubbled-from-use-case); the __sentryReported flag is what makes
this safe.
- Double-report-guard paragraph now mentions withCapture, SentryLogger,
and RecordingLogger all check the flag (not just SentryLogger).
di-explainer.html §08 — "Instrumentation symbols":
- Wiring path updated from "withSpan(tracer, ...)" to
"withSpan(withCapture(...))" to reflect the post-merge wiring.
- New "Two wrappers, applied as a sandwich" table comparing what each
wrapper does and where it fires; closing note that repos can't use
the wrapper because they own per-call attributes.
Also bundled: a 1-line aesthetic SVG noise tweak in di-explainer.html
(opacity='0.25', baseFrequency 0.85→0.95) that was sitting in the
working tree before this session — preserved across the Plan 10 merge
via stash/pop and now committed alongside the doc update.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Inserts a new §06 "Tracing & error capture" between the existing
"Tradeoffs by part" (§05) and the verdict (which moves to §07).
Includes the trace tree (HTTP → tRPC → controller → use-case → repo
→ Payload), capture-rules table (where captureException fires per
layer + the no-capture rule for defineErrorMiddleware), the
__sentryReported double-report guard explanation, and the R31–R38
PII rule list. Adds matching CSS (.trace-tree / .capture-rules /
.pii-rules) tuned to the existing dark-paper palette and Fraunces
heading font. Updates the contents nav from 6 → 7 columns.
di-explainer.html gets a new §08 "Instrumentation symbols" with cards
for TRACER and LOGGER, the bindAll() Rule-0 wiring path, and a note
on why feature containers also bind the symbols. Two-column grid
collapses to one on narrow viewports.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Each folder/file in the feature anatomy gets its own card with:
- Brief one-line description
- Two-column pros/cons list (3-4 items each)
Covers 22 parts grouped into 21 cards: entities/models, entities/errors,
application/repositories interfaces, application/services interfaces,
application/use-cases, infrastructure real repo, infrastructure mock
repo, infrastructure services, interface-adapters/controllers, di/
(symbols, module, container, bind-production, bind-dev-seed),
integrations/api/procedures, integrations/api/router, integrations/cms,
ui, __factories__, __contracts__, __seeds__, src/index.ts.
Each card uses the same paper/cream palette as the rest of the page;
pros/cons differentiated by color (forest-green + / oxblood −) and a
JetBrains-Mono leading character.
Verdict section renumbered to §06; contents nav updated to 6-column
grid.
- CLAUDE.md Key Conventions: 'App bootstrap' rule rewritten as 'Three
binding modes per feature' — describes USE_DEV_SEED + NODE_ENV
resolution order and the new ./di/bind-dev-seed export.
- AGENTS.md (root): exports list now mentions ./ui + ./di/bind-dev-seed;
Per-feature public-API surface table gains a row; Apps section shows
the bindAll() dispatcher with three-rule logic.
- docs/architecture/vertical-feature-spec.md §6: file shape now
includes bind-dev-seed.ts, bind-dev-seed.test.ts, __seeds__/dev.ts;
package.json exports list updated to include ./di/bind-dev-seed.
- docs/architecture/data-flow-explainer.html: anatomy tree gains
__seeds__/ row; LAYERS.di description updated with new binders +
cross-link to di-explainer.html; new LAYERS.seeds entry; public-
surface card expanded to six subpaths.
- docs/superpowers/refactor-logs/2026-05-06-input-output-unification.md
§7: new 'Post-Plan-9: dev-seed binders' entry summarizing the rollout
(commits, per-feature additions, app wiring, tests, turbo, docs).
- bind-production.test.ts: dispatcher tests use vi.stubEnv (typesafe
way to test process.env in TypeScript 5+ with @types/node read-only
process.env types). 4 dispatcher tests + 2 bindAllProduction tests
= 7 tests total.
User pushback: 'I already need mock data for dev and for testing at
runtime' — i.e., the dual role of the mock is obvious, not surprising.
Earlier framing was condescending.
Reframe around 'runtime reach':
- Section blurb leads with 'three artifacts at different distances
from runtime'
- Three-roles card intro: same neighborhood, different reach. Mock is
reached by runtime; contract + factory only by tests.
- 'The mock has two jobs' → 'The mock is reached from two directions
— both legitimate, neither is the test version'.
- Contract framing now leads with its real purpose: it tests the mock
alongside the real impl so you can trust the mock as a runtime
artifact.
User asked: 'arent mocks also related to testing?' — yes, but the mock
plays two roles where the contract and factory play one each. §04 now
opens with that framing.
What's new:
- Section title bumped to 'Mocks, contracts & factories'
- New three-roles diagram at the top of §04 visualizing the chain:
IArticlesRepository → MockArticlesRepository + ArticlesRepository
→ articlesRepositoryContract → articleFactory
- Two ordered lists explaining the mock's dual job (DI default binding
+ direct test fake) and the contract/factory's single test-only roles
- Three new expandable code examples:
· the mock as DI binding (real BlogModule code)
· the mock as direct test fake (use-case test, no container)
· the contract running against both impls (proof-of-parity)
- New CSS for .three-roles-diagram, .role-* boxes, .role-arrow with
vertical connector lines, .role-jobs lists with counter-leading
decimal numbering
The existing Contracts and Factories cards stay in place below — they
provide the deeper detail on each individual artifact.
Single-file HTML at docs/architecture/data-flow-explainer.html.
Self-contained — Google Fonts (Fraunces + JetBrains Mono) is the only
external resource; all interactivity is vanilla JS, all diagrams are
inline SVG/CSS.
Five sections:
01. Feature anatomy — clickable folder tree, layer detail card swaps
to explain entities / application / infrastructure / interface-
adapters / di / integrations / ui / __factories__ / __contracts__
/ public surface.
02. Request flow — step-through pipeline (12 stages, including the
success/error fork) with prev/next/play and a feature picker
(auth, blog, marketing-pages, navigation, media). Each feature
swaps real code snippets, the procedures.ts error map, and the
use-case/controller pattern.
03. Dependency injection — interactive DI canvas with default/prod
toggle so the user sees the same symbol resolving to mock vs
real Payload-backed impl. Real module.ts and bind-production.ts
code blocks below.
04. Contracts and factories — expandable sections with the actual
defineContractSuite + defineFactory code from packages/blog.
05. Verdict — short answer (yes), tradeoffs, badge row.
Editorial aesthetic: cream paper, deep ink, oxblood accent, Fraunces
display + JetBrains Mono code. Subtle paper noise + ruled-line bg.
No CDN scripts beyond fonts.
