# TDD Foundation — Design Spec > **Note (2026-05-05, post-Plan-8):** File-path references in this spec describe the **pre-Plan-8 layout**. Plan 8 (Lazar pattern conformance) introduced `entities/models/`, `entities/errors/.ts`, the `.mock.ts` suffix, dropped `payload-` prefixes, and made use cases / controllers factory functions. The TDD principles, gap catalogue, and `core-testing` package design remain valid; only the example paths and snippets shifted. See `docs/superpowers/refactor-logs/2026-05-05-lazar-pattern-conformance.md` and ADR-012 for the mapping. **Date:** 2026-05-05 **Status:** Approved **Author:** Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) **Reviewer:** Danijel **Supersedes:** none — extends `2026-04-21-vertical-monorepo-refactor-design.md` §13B --- ## 1. Goal Make full TDD the path of least resistance in this monorepo so that agentic workers (and humans) cannot produce production code without first writing a failing test. Close the ten gaps catalogued in §3. The success criterion is operational, not aspirational: a fresh subagent given any plan task in this template should hit a failing test before they touch production code, and a human reviewer should be able to read a single guide (`docs/guides/tdd-workflow.md`) and the per-feature `AGENTS.md` to understand why each test exists. ## 2. Non-goals - Mutation testing (deferred — Tier 3) - Visual regression beyond Storybook smoke (deferred — Tier 3) - Property-based testing (deferred) - Replacing existing passing tests (we extend the test suite, we do not rewrite working tests for stylistic reasons) - Docker-in-CI for full Payload integration tests (mock at `payload` module boundary instead — much faster, and the contract suite catches drift) ## 3. The ten gaps | # | Gap | Closed by | |---|-----|-----------| | 1 | Zero tests in `core-ui`, `core-api`, `core-cms`, `core-trpc` | §6.5, §6.6 | | 2 | No React component testing infrastructure | §5, §6.5 | | 3 | No TDD process documentation (only placement docs exist) | §7.1 | | 4 | Inline fixtures duplicated across tests; no factories | §5.1, §6.3 | | 5 | No contract tests — Mock and Payload repos drift independently | §5.2, §6.4 | | 6 | Vitest base lacks safety defaults (`clearMocks`, `restoreMocks`, jsdom env) | §6.2 | | 7 | `adding-a-feature.md` does not enforce TDD order | §7.2 | | 8 | Storybook stories are not executed as tests | §6.8 | | 9 | Apps have no unit tests (route handlers, providers, bind-production wiring) | §6.7 | | 10 | No CI — tests can rot silently | §6.11 | ## 4. Architecture overview Three concentric layers of TDD support: 1. **Tooling layer** — `core-typescript` and `core-eslint` provide configs every package inherits. 2. **Test-utils layer** — a new package `@repo/core-testing` (tag: `tooling`) provides shared helpers: `defineFactory`, `defineContractSuite`, `renderWithProviders`, mock-payload helper, mock-trpc helper, jsdom setup file. 3. **Per-package convention** — every feature/core package follows the same skeleton: factories in `src/__factories__/`, contract suites in `src/__contracts__/`, colocated `*.test.{ts,tsx}` for units, `tests/*.feature.test.ts` for integration. ``` ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ apps/* (web-next, web-tanstack, cms, storybook) │ │ ├─ vitest.config.ts (jsdom) │ │ ├─ src/**/*.test.{ts,tsx} ← unit + RSC smoke │ │ └─ e2e/*.spec.ts ← Playwright (existing) │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ packages//* (auth, blog, media, marketing-pages, │ │ navigation) │ │ ├─ vitest.config.ts (node by default; jsdom for ui/) │ │ ├─ src/__factories__/*.factory.ts │ │ ├─ src/__contracts__/*-repository.contract.ts │ │ ├─ src/**/*.test.ts ← unit │ │ └─ tests/*.feature.test.ts ← feature integration │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ packages/core-* (shared, ui, api, cms, trpc) │ │ ├─ vitest.config.ts (jsdom for core-ui; node for rest) │ │ └─ src/**/*.test.{ts,tsx} ← composition smoke │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ packages/core-testing (NEW, tooling tag) │ │ ├─ factory/define-factory │ │ ├─ contract/define-contract-suite │ │ ├─ react/render-with-providers, mock-trpc │ │ ├─ payload/mock-payload-module, stub-config │ │ └─ setup/{jsdom,node} │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ packages/core-typescript (tooling) │ │ ├─ vitest.base.node.ts ← safety defaults + coverage │ │ └─ vitest.base.jsdom.ts ← extends node + jsdom + setup │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ``` Boundary rules unchanged. `core-testing` is `tooling`, so any package may depend on it (devDependency only). ## 5. New package: `@repo/core-testing` ### 5.1 `factory/` ```typescript // define-factory.ts export interface FactoryContext { sequence: number; } export interface Factory { build(overrides?: Partial): T; buildList(count: number, overrides?: Partial): T[]; reset(): void; } export function defineFactory(builder: (ctx: FactoryContext) => T): Factory { let sequence = 0; return { build(overrides) { sequence += 1; const base = builder({ sequence }); return deepMerge(base, overrides ?? {}) as T; }, buildList(count, overrides) { return Array.from({ length: count }, () => this.build(overrides)); }, reset() { sequence = 0; }, }; } ``` Required factories per feature (created in plan): | Feature | Factories | |---------|-----------| | `auth` | `userFactory`, `sessionFactory` | | `blog` | `articleFactory` | | `media` | `mediaFactory` | | `marketing-pages` | `pageFactory`, `siteSettingsFactory` | | `navigation` | `headerFactory`, `navItemFactory` | Mock repositories are refactored to consume factories where they need defaults — eliminates per-test inline fixture duplication. ### 5.2 `contract/` ```typescript // define-contract-suite.ts export interface ContractContext { buildSubject: () => Promise | T; } export interface ContractSuite { run(buildSubject: () => Promise | T): void; } export function defineContractSuite( name: string, suite: (ctx: ContractContext) => void, ): ContractSuite { return { run(buildSubject) { describe(`Contract: ${name}`, () => { suite({ buildSubject }); }); }, }; } ``` Repository interfaces with multiple implementations get a contract suite. The same suite runs against the Mock impl AND the Payload impl (with `vi.mock('payload')`). Required for: - `IArticlesRepository` (Mock + Payload) - `IUsersRepository` (Mock + Payload) - `ISessionsRepository` (Mock + Payload) - `IMediaRepository` (Mock + Payload) - `IPagesRepository` (Mock + Payload) - `ISiteSettingsRepository` (Mock + Payload) - `IHeaderRepository` (Mock + Payload) ### 5.3 `react/` ```typescript // render-with-providers.tsx export interface RenderOptions { trpc?: { mocks?: Record }; queryClient?: QueryClient; } export function renderWithProviders( ui: ReactElement, options: RenderOptions = {}, ): RenderResult & { queryClient: QueryClient } { const queryClient = options.queryClient ?? new QueryClient({ defaultOptions: { queries: { retry: false }, mutations: { retry: false } }, }); const trpcClient = createMockTrpcClient(options.trpc?.mocks ?? {}); const Wrapper = ({ children }: PropsWithChildren) => ( {children} ); return { ...render(ui, { wrapper: Wrapper }), queryClient }; } ``` `createMockTrpcClient` is a thin wrapper that returns hardcoded data per procedure path; full type inference preserved via the `AppRouter` type from `@repo/core-api`. ### 5.4 `payload/` ```typescript // mock-payload-module.ts export function mockPayloadModule(impl: Partial): void { vi.mock('payload', () => ({ getPayload: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(impl), })); } // stub-config.ts export const stubPayloadConfig = {} as SanitizedConfig; ``` ### 5.5 `setup/` ```typescript // jsdom.ts import '@testing-library/jest-dom/vitest'; import { afterEach } from 'vitest'; import { cleanup } from '@testing-library/react'; afterEach(() => { cleanup(); }); // node.ts // Currently a no-op; reserved for future global setup. export {}; ``` ### 5.6 Package shape ``` packages/core-testing/ ├── src/ │ ├── factory/ │ │ ├── define-factory.ts │ │ ├── define-factory.test.ts │ │ └── index.ts │ ├── contract/ │ │ ├── define-contract-suite.ts │ │ ├── define-contract-suite.test.ts │ │ └── index.ts │ ├── react/ │ │ ├── render-with-providers.tsx │ │ ├── render-with-providers.test.tsx │ │ ├── mock-trpc.ts │ │ └── index.ts │ ├── payload/ │ │ ├── mock-payload-module.ts │ │ ├── stub-config.ts │ │ └── index.ts │ ├── setup/ │ │ ├── jsdom.ts │ │ └── node.ts │ └── index.ts ├── package.json # tag: tooling, exports: ./factory, ./contract, ./react, ./payload, ./setup/jsdom, ./setup/node ├── tsconfig.json ├── vitest.config.ts └── AGENTS.md ``` `package.json` exports map: ```json { "exports": { ".": "./src/index.ts", "./factory": "./src/factory/index.ts", "./contract": "./src/contract/index.ts", "./react": "./src/react/index.ts", "./payload": "./src/payload/index.ts", "./setup/jsdom": "./src/setup/jsdom.ts", "./setup/node": "./src/setup/node.ts" } } ``` ## 6. Closing each gap ### 6.1 Tests in core packages (Gap 1) - **`core-ui`** — jsdom env. Add one `.test.tsx` per primitive (Button, Input, Card, etc. — discovered during execution). Use RTL + `renderWithProviders` (no providers needed for primitives, but pattern uniform). - **`core-api`** — node env. Test that `appRouter` exposes the expected feature routers (`appRouter._def.procedures` walked recursively). - **`core-cms`** — node env. Test that the composed Payload config has expected collections + globals (`config.collections.map(c => c.slug)`). - **`core-trpc`** — node env (provider tests use jsdom). Test that the client factory wires `httpBatchLink` + `superjson`. Use `msw` or fetch stub. ### 6.2 React component testing (Gap 2) `core-typescript` exports two configs: ```typescript // vitest.base.node.ts export const nodeVitestConfig = defineConfig({ test: { globals: true, environment: 'node', include: ['src/**/*.test.ts', 'tests/**/*.test.ts'], setupFiles: ['@repo/core-testing/setup/node'], clearMocks: true, restoreMocks: true, mockReset: true, unstubGlobals: true, sequence: { shuffle: true }, coverage: { provider: 'v8', reporter: ['text', 'html', 'lcov'], include: ['src/**'], exclude: [ 'src/**/*.test.{ts,tsx}', 'src/**/index.ts', 'src/__factories__/**', 'src/__contracts__/**', ], thresholds: { statements: 80, branches: 75, functions: 80, lines: 80 }, }, }, }); // vitest.base.jsdom.ts import { mergeConfig } from 'vitest/config'; import { nodeVitestConfig } from './vitest.base.node'; export const jsdomVitestConfig = mergeConfig(nodeVitestConfig, defineConfig({ test: { environment: 'jsdom', setupFiles: ['@repo/core-testing/setup/jsdom'], include: ['src/**/*.test.{ts,tsx}', 'tests/**/*.test.{ts,tsx}'], }, })); ``` ### 6.3 Factories (Gap 4) See §5.1. One factory file per entity, in `src/__factories__/`. Factories deliver stable defaults so snapshot diffs only reflect the SUT's behavior. `__factories__` excluded from coverage. ### 6.4 Contract suites (Gap 5) See §5.2. One contract suite per repository interface, run against every implementation. Each repo `*.test.ts` becomes ~5 lines: `vi.mock('payload', ...); contractSuite.run(() => new RealRepo(stubConfig));`. Specific edge cases unique to one impl (e.g., Payload doc → domain mapping) stay in the impl-specific test file alongside the contract run. ### 6.5 jsdom + RTL (Gap 2 + Gap 1) `core-ui` adopts `jsdomVitestConfig`. Test pattern: ```typescript // packages/core-ui/src/atoms/button/button.test.tsx import { describe, it, expect } from 'vitest'; import { renderWithProviders } from '@repo/core-testing/react'; import userEvent from '@testing-library/user-event'; import { screen } from '@testing-library/react'; import { Button } from './button'; describe('Button', () => { it('renders the label', () => { renderWithProviders(); expect(screen.getByRole('button', { name: 'Click me' })).toBeInTheDocument(); }); it('calls onClick when activated', async () => { const handleClick = vi.fn(); renderWithProviders(); await userEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button')); expect(handleClick).toHaveBeenCalledOnce(); }); }); ``` ### 6.6 Composition tests for `core-api`, `core-cms`, `core-trpc` (Gap 1) ```typescript // packages/core-api/src/router.test.ts describe('appRouter composition', () => { it('exposes blog router', () => { expect(appRouter._def.procedures).toHaveProperty('blog'); }); it('exposes auth, media, marketing-pages, navigation routers', () => { ... }); }); // packages/core-cms/src/config.test.ts describe('payloadConfig composition', () => { it('registers all feature collections', () => { const slugs = config.collections.map(c => c.slug); expect(slugs).toEqual(expect.arrayContaining(['articles', 'users', 'media', 'pages'])); }); }); ``` ### 6.7 App tests (Gap 9) Per app: ```typescript // apps/web-next/src/server/bind-production.test.ts describe('bindProduction', () => { it('binds all 4 feature repositories exactly once', async () => { const spies = { blog: vi.spyOn(blogModule, 'bindProductionArticles'), auth: vi.spyOn(authModule, 'bindProductionUsers'), media: vi.spyOn(mediaModule, 'bindProductionMedia'), marketing: vi.spyOn(marketingModule, 'bindProductionPages'), }; await bindProduction(); Object.values(spies).forEach(s => expect(s).toHaveBeenCalledOnce()); }); }); // apps/web-next/src/app/providers.test.tsx describe('Providers', () => { it('wraps children with QueryClientProvider and TrpcProvider', () => { renderWithProviders(
); expect(screen.getByTestId('child')).toBeInTheDocument(); }); }); // apps/cms/src/payload.config.test.ts describe('payload.config', () => { it('exports a SanitizedConfig with all feature collections', () => { expect(payloadConfig.collections.length).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(4); }); }); ``` ### 6.8 Storybook test runner (Gap 8) ```bash pnpm add -D -w @storybook/test-runner playwright --filter @repo/storybook ``` `apps/storybook/package.json` gains: ```json { "scripts": { "test-storybook": "test-storybook --url http://localhost:6006" } } ``` Root script: `pnpm test:stories` runs Storybook test-runner against a started Storybook instance. CI builds Storybook static, serves it, runs `test-storybook` against the static URL. Smoke-tests every story (mounts, no console errors). ### 6.9 Coverage thresholds (Gap 6) Initial threshold: 80% statements / 75% branches / 80% functions / 80% lines (project-wide). `entities/`, `application/use-cases/`, `interface-adapters/controllers/` should hit 100% — enforced via per-directory config: ```typescript coverage: { thresholds: { 'src/entities/**': { statements: 100, branches: 100 }, 'src/application/use-cases/**': { statements: 100, branches: 95 }, 'src/interface-adapters/controllers/**': { statements: 100, branches: 95 }, statements: 80, branches: 75, functions: 80, lines: 80, }, }, ``` Tightening allowed as suite matures. Initial pass may need test additions to cross threshold — included as part of each task. ### 6.10 Sequence shuffling `sequence: { shuffle: true }` surfaces tests that depend on execution order (a class of flake that's nearly impossible to debug otherwise). If a test fails on a non-default seed, the failure log includes the seed for reproduction. ### 6.11 CI (Gap 10) `.github/workflows/ci.yml`: ```yaml name: CI on: push: { branches: [main] } pull_request: env: TURBO_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.TURBO_TOKEN }} TURBO_TEAM: ${{ vars.TURBO_TEAM }} jobs: validate: runs-on: ubuntu-latest services: postgres: image: postgres:16-alpine env: POSTGRES_PASSWORD: postgres POSTGRES_USER: postgres POSTGRES_DB: cms ports: ['5432:5432'] options: >- --health-cmd "pg_isready -U postgres" --health-interval 10s --health-timeout 5s --health-retries 5 steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - uses: pnpm/action-setup@v4 with: { version: 9 } - uses: actions/setup-node@v4 with: { node-version: 22, cache: pnpm } - run: pnpm install --frozen-lockfile - run: pnpm typecheck - run: pnpm lint - run: pnpm turbo boundaries - run: pnpm test -- --coverage env: DATABASE_URL: postgres://postgres:postgres@localhost:5432/cms PAYLOAD_SECRET: test-secret-do-not-use-in-prod - run: pnpm build - uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4 if: always() with: name: coverage path: '**/coverage/lcov.info' e2e: needs: validate runs-on: ubuntu-latest services: postgres: image: postgres:16-alpine env: { POSTGRES_PASSWORD: postgres, POSTGRES_USER: postgres, POSTGRES_DB: cms } ports: ['5432:5432'] options: >- --health-cmd "pg_isready -U postgres" --health-interval 10s --health-timeout 5s --health-retries 5 steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - uses: pnpm/action-setup@v4 with: { version: 9 } - uses: actions/setup-node@v4 with: { node-version: 22, cache: pnpm } - run: pnpm install --frozen-lockfile - run: pnpm exec playwright install --with-deps chromium - run: pnpm test:e2e env: DATABASE_URL: postgres://postgres:postgres@localhost:5432/cms PAYLOAD_SECRET: test-secret-do-not-use-in-prod storybook: needs: validate runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - uses: pnpm/action-setup@v4 with: { version: 9 } - uses: actions/setup-node@v4 with: { node-version: 22, cache: pnpm } - run: pnpm install --frozen-lockfile - run: pnpm build-storybook --filter @repo/storybook - run: pnpm exec playwright install --with-deps chromium - run: pnpm exec concurrently -k -s first -n "SB,TEST" -c "magenta,blue" "pnpm exec http-server apps/storybook/storybook-static --port 6006 --silent" "pnpm exec wait-on tcp:6006 && pnpm test-storybook --filter @repo/storybook" ``` ## 7. Documentation changes ### 7.1 New: `docs/guides/tdd-workflow.md` Outline: 1. **The cycle** — red, green, refactor, with the blog example walked end-to-end. 2. **Test naming** — `describe(SUT)` / `it("does X when Y")`. 3. **AAA structure** — Arrange / Act / Assert with examples. 4. **When to mock — decision tree** (DOT graph): ``` Pure function? → no mock Use case? → mock repository at DI level (rebind) Repository (Payload)?→ mock 'payload' module + use stubPayloadConfig Component with data? → renderWithProviders with trpc.mocks Route handler? → mock at boundary only (no deep mocks) ``` 5. **Test pyramid for this monorepo** — counts per layer; entities + use-cases + controllers > integration > component > e2e. 6. **What NOT to test** — getters/setters, framework code, third-party libs, types-only modules. 7. **Coverage targets** — 80/75/80/80 baseline; 100% in entities + use-cases + controllers. 8. **Factory usage** — when to call `factory.build()` vs construct objects manually. 9. **Contract suite usage** — how to add a new repo impl (write impl, run contract). 10. **Running tests** — watch mode, focused tests (`it.only`), debugging failures. ### 7.2 Restructure: `docs/guides/adding-a-feature.md` Interleave tests with implementation. Each layer becomes a red-green pair: ``` Step 1: Write failing test for entity schema (Zod parse rejects invalid input) Step 2: Implement entity to pass Step 3: Write factory in src/__factories__/.factory.ts Step 4: Write failing test for use case using factory + mock repo Step 5: Implement use case to pass Step 6: Write contract suite in src/__contracts__/-repository.contract.ts Step 7: Implement Mock repo, run contract against it (red → green) Step 8: Implement Payload repo, run same contract (red → green) Step 9: Write failing controller test Step 10: Implement controller to pass Step 11: Write failing tRPC integration test in tests/.feature.test.ts Step 12: Wire router to pass Step 13: (UI optional) Write failing component test with renderWithProviders Step 14: Implement component to pass Step 15: Wire into core-api / core-cms, run typecheck + lint + boundaries ``` Add at top: **"You may not advance to the next layer until the current layer's tests are red, then green."** ### 7.3 Cross-link `testing-strategy.md` becomes the *placement* doc; `tdd-workflow.md` is the *process* doc. Each links to the other. `AGENTS.md` references both. ### 7.4 ADR New: `docs/decisions/adr-011-tdd-foundation.md` capturing: - Why a dedicated `core-testing` package (vs duplicating helpers) - Why factories instead of fixture files - Why contract suites instead of separate test files per impl - Why `sequence.shuffle` (catches order-dependent tests) - Why `vi.mock('payload')` over a real test DB (speed, determinism) ### 7.5 AGENTS.md updates Root `AGENTS.md`: add `@repo/core-testing` row to package map, link `docs/guides/tdd-workflow.md`. Each feature `AGENTS.md`: add a "Tests" section listing factories, contract suites, and example test commands. Root `CLAUDE.md`: add a "TDD" subsection under Quick Start with the canonical commands. ## 8. Plan structure (preview) Plan 7 — TDD Foundation, with these tasks (each TDD'd, self-reviewed, two-stage reviewed): | # | Task | Approx. files | |---|------|---------------| | 1 | Scaffold `@repo/core-testing` (TDD itself) | ~20 created | | 2 | Add jsdom + node Vitest bases to `core-typescript`, migrate 5 feature configs | 2 created, 5 modified | | 3 | Add factories to all 5 features, refactor mock repos to consume them | 8 created, 5 modified | | 4 | Define + run contract suites for all 7 repository interfaces | 7 created, 14 modified (each impl `.test.ts` runs the contract) | | 5 | Add tests + jsdom config to `core-ui` | ~10 created | | 6 | Add tests + node config to `core-api`, `core-cms`, `core-trpc` | ~10 created | | 7 | Add unit tests to `apps/web-next`, `apps/web-tanstack`, `apps/cms` | ~10 created | | 8 | Storybook test-runner integration in `apps/storybook` | 1 modified, 1 created | | 9 | Write `docs/guides/tdd-workflow.md`, restructure `adding-a-feature.md`, cross-link | 1 created, 2 modified | | 10 | ADR-011 + AGENTS.md updates + CLAUDE.md update | 1 created, 6 modified | | 11 | CI workflow `.github/workflows/ci.yml` with services + coverage upload | 1 created | | 12 | Coverage thresholds enforced; tighten where suites are mature | 0 created, 12 modified (per-package vitest configs) | Estimated rough total: ~70 files created, ~25 files modified. ## 9. Tradeoffs | Decision | Pro | Con | |----------|-----|-----| | New `core-testing` package | DRY; one canonical place for helpers; testable in isolation | One more package to maintain (but small, mostly stable) | | Coverage thresholds | Builds fail when coverage drops; agents can't merge regressions | Initial enforcement may need test additions to cross threshold (planned for) | | Sequence shuffle | Catches order-dependent flakes early | First run may surface latent flakes; we fix them as found | | `vi.mock('payload')` over real DB in tests | Fast (~ms vs seconds), deterministic, no Docker requirement | Requires contract suite to catch mock/real drift (which is exactly why we add §5.2) | | Storybook test-runner | Every story becomes a smoke test for free | Adds a CI job (~1-2 min); offset by Turbo cache | | CI in this template | TDD without CI rots in weeks | Template users must rotate the Turbo token themselves; documented in CI yaml comments | ## 10. Acceptance criteria - `@repo/core-testing` exists, exports the documented surface, has its own tests passing. - Every feature has factories in `src/__factories__/` and a contract suite per repository interface. - `core-ui`, `core-api`, `core-cms`, `core-trpc` each have ≥1 passing test. - All 4 apps have ≥1 unit test (provider/bind-production/route). - `pnpm test -- --coverage` passes with thresholds. - `pnpm test-storybook` passes against built Storybook. - `docs/guides/tdd-workflow.md` exists; `adding-a-feature.md` interleaves tests with implementation. - `.github/workflows/ci.yml` runs typecheck, lint, boundaries, test, build, e2e, storybook on every PR. - ADR-011 committed. - AGENTS.md and CLAUDE.md reference the new TDD workflow. ## 11. Out of scope (explicit) - Mutation testing (Stryker) - Property-based testing (fast-check) - Visual regression beyond Storybook smoke (Chromatic, Percy) - Real-DB integration tests (testcontainers Postgres) - Performance/load testing - Security scanning in CI (separate concern) These are good ideas for later but would expand scope past "make TDD frictionless." Tracked as future work.