Files
agentic-dev/docs
Danijel Martinek c85f96c62e feat(skills): improve-codebase-architecture skill adapted for template-vertical
Adapts mattpocock/skills/engineering/improve-codebase-architecture to
this repo. Four files at .claude/skills/improve-codebase-architecture/:

  SKILL.md (104 lines):
    - Explore -> Present candidates -> Grilling loop process
    - "Hard constraints (do not propose violations)" section
      enumerating ADRs 006/008/010/012/013/014/015/017/020/021 that
      bound the design space
    - Repointed at docs/glossary.md (not CONTEXT.md) and
      docs/decisions/ (not docs/adr/)
    - Exploration shortcuts specific to this repo: pnpm fallow,
      pnpm coverage:diff, feature.manifest.ts, pnpm turbo boundaries
    - Grilling loop side-effects target the right glossary section
      and the next available ADR number (currently 022)

  DEEPENING.md (93 lines):
    - 4 dependency categories mapped to this repo's reality:
        Cat 1 (in-process) -> entities/use-cases/presenters
        Cat 2 (local-substitutable) -> our existing real + mock
          adapter pattern (every port has both; mocks ARE stand-ins)
        Cat 3 (remote but owned) -> cross-feature events via
          IEventBus (E0/E1 rules)
        Cat 4 (true external) -> Payload, Sentry/OTel, socket.io
          (each constrained to its vendor-isolation seam by ADR)
    - Seam discipline section recognises DI symbols + manifest entries
      as concrete seams alongside .interface.ts files
    - Testing strategy: replace not layer (matches ADR-020 L0 + L1)
    - Conformance check command list at the end (typecheck, lint,
      test --coverage, conformance, fallow:audit, coverage:diff)

  INTERFACE-DESIGN.md (66 lines):
    - Parallel sub-agent "Design It Twice" pattern preserved
    - Every sub-agent brief MUST include glossary terms + ADR
      constraints + manifest awareness
    - Output items extended with "Manifest + binder impact" and
      "ADR conflicts (if any)"
    - Comparison axes include conformance impact + coverage delta
    - Cross-feature moves flag release-please version-bump
      implications (per ADR-021 commit-path targeting)

  LANGUAGE.md (79 lines):
    - Matt's 7 abstract terms preserved (module, interface,
      implementation, depth, seam, adapter, leverage, locality)
    - New "Mapping to this repo's identifiers" table — abstract
      term -> concrete file shape (e.g. seam -> *.interface.ts +
      DI symbol + manifest entry + <gen:*> anchor)
    - Rejected framings extended with our reserved meanings
      ("boundary" stays the ESLint workspace-tag term; "service"
      stays the DI port term)

Per user follow-up: vocabulary anchored so that "module" defaults
to "feature" in this repo (since features are our primary unit of
organisation). Abstract refactor sense survives only when the cross-
scale abstraction is the point. Glossary.md updated:
  - "Feature" entry adds the "module = feature in refactor sense"
    cross-link
  - New "Architecture refactor vocabulary" section with 9 terms
    (Module, Interface (refactor sense), Implementation, Depth,
    Seam, Adapter, Leverage, Locality, Deletion test, Deepening)
    — all framed so feature is the primary instance
  - Flagged ambiguities entry for "module" rewritten to capture the
    three coexisting senses (workspace package / Node ESM / refactor
    vocabulary defaulting to feature); new entries for "seam" and
    "adapter" to prevent drift with the existing "boundary" / "service"
    / "scope" reservations

Hooks updated:
  - session-start.sh skills line lists the new skill
  - prompt-context.sh adds a 10th keyword group firing on
    refactor / deepening / shallow / architecture / seam / adapter /
    interface design / design it twice — inject points at SKILL.md
    + summarises the vocabulary and hard constraints

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-13 17:30:59 +02:00
..

docs/

Documentation hub for the template-vertical monorepo. Start here if you landed at docs/ directly.

For the project entry point, see ../CLAUDE.md (humans + agents) and ../AGENTS.md (package map + boundary rules).


Resolving terminology

glossary.mdcanonical vocabulary for every cross-cutting term used in this repo (feature, use case, manifest, conformance, slice, coverage band, dispatch, etc.). When in doubt about what a term means here, check the glossary first.


How the documentation is organised

docs/
├── glossary.md                 # canonical vocabulary
├── architecture/               # design + invariants (rarely changes)
│   ├── overview.md             # high-level architecture summary
│   ├── vertical-feature-spec.md  # canonical feature design spec
│   ├── dependency-flow.md      # workspace + import-graph reference
│   ├── template-tiers.md       # must-have vs optional core packages
│   ├── agent-first-workflow-and-conformance.md  # workflow + 5-gate design
│   ├── data-flow-explainer.html         # interactive (single-file)
│   ├── di-explainer.html                # interactive (single-file)
│   ├── feature-conformance-explainer.html  # interactive (single-file)
│   └── audit-and-compliance-explainer.html # interactive (single-file)
├── decisions/                  # ADRs (durable design decisions)
│   └── adr-001..adr-020.md     # 20 ADRs, numbered in order accepted
├── guides/                     # day-to-day how-to docs
│   ├── runbook.md              # ← first time? read this end-to-end
│   ├── conformance-quickref.md
│   ├── coverage.md             # 4-layer coverage cookbook (ADR-020)
│   ├── releasing.md            # release-please workflow + CHANGELOG cookbook (ADR-021)
│   ├── tdd-workflow.md
│   ├── testing-strategy.md
│   ├── adding-a-feature.md           # manual path
│   ├── scaffolding-a-feature.md      # generator path (preferred)
│   ├── scaffolding-core-package.md
│   ├── scaffolding-core-ui-component.md
│   ├── events-and-jobs.md      # requires `gen core-package events`
│   ├── realtime.md             # requires `gen core-package realtime`
│   ├── audit-and-compliance.md # requires `gen core-package audit`
│   ├── frontend-work-shape.md
│   └── infrastructure-work-shape.md
└── work/                       # local task system (PRD → Epic → Story → Task)
    ├── README.md               # work-folder layout + PRD lifecycle
    ├── _state.json             # derived index (orchestrator-managed)
    ├── prds/<date>-<slug>.prd.md  # PRDs
    └── <epic-slug>/...         # one folder per epic

Document types

Type Where Purpose Lifetime
Glossary glossary.md One sentence per term; flagged ambiguities Long-lived
Architecture architecture/ Design invariants, system shape Long-lived
ADR decisions/adr-NNN-*.md Single decision: context → choice → consequences Long-lived
Guide guides/ How-to, reference, troubleshooting Updated as features evolve
PRD work/prds/*.prd.md Implementation seed for one epic draft → in-review → approved → shipped
Epic / Story / Task work/<epic>/... Workflow artifacts Created → in-progress → done

When to put what where

  • A new architectural decision (events, audit, instrumentation choices, etc.) → ADR. Number is 001 + max(existing).
  • A new how-to (cookbook, troubleshooting, "how do I do X") → guide.
  • A new vocabulary term that's cross-cutting → glossary, alphabetically grouped.
  • A new initiative (multi-task feature work) → PRD seed. The decomposer refuses to run on draft — flip to approved after human review. pnpm work prd-ship <id> auto-flips to shipped on epic completion.
  • A new interactive diagram → drop a single-file HTML at architecture/<name>-explainer.html; cross-link from the other explainers + from architecture/overview.md's Interactive explainers section.

See also

Conventions

  • Markdown over HTML unless the doc is genuinely interactive (the 4 architecture HTMLs).
  • Reference ADRs by ID (ADR-NNN) rather than path so renames don't break links.
  • Cross-reference paths sparingly — they rot. Prefer naming the doc (e.g. "see the coverage guide").
  • Don't duplicate — if two docs describe the same thing, consolidate or pick a single source of truth and link from the other.
  • Date PRDs + ADRs in the file name (YYYY-MM-DD prefix for PRDs) and in their frontmatter.
  • Each ADR cites at least one related ADR when extending or building on prior decisions.