Closes the user's ask: versioning + a changelog generated on merging
to main, building on the just-mandated Conventional Commits substrate
(CLAUDE.md Key Conventions).
Architecture: ADR-021. Cookbook: docs/guides/releasing.md.
Initial state — six tracked packages at v0.1.0:
- . -> template-vertical (tag: template-v...)
- packages/auth -> @repo/auth (tag: auth-v...)
- packages/blog -> @repo/blog (tag: blog-v...)
- packages/media -> @repo/media (tag: media-v...)
- packages/marketing-pages -> @repo/marketing-pages (tag: marketing-pages-v...)
- packages/navigation -> @repo/navigation (tag: navigation-v...)
Core packages, tooling, and apps are NOT independently versioned
(ADR-021 rationale: core bumps cascade; apps aren't consumables;
surfacing them would create noise without information).
Configuration:
- release-please-config.json - 6 tracked packages, hybrid scope,
pre-1.0 conservative bump policy
(feat: -> patch, feat!: -> minor),
conventional-commit type mapping
- .release-please-manifest.json - baseline 0.1.0 for all 6 packages
- .github/workflows/release-please.yml - googleapis/release-please-
action@v4 on push to main,
concurrency-gated, write
permissions for the rolling PR
Workflow: on every push to main, release-please scans commits since
the last release tag PER PACKAGE (using commit-path, not the
conventional-commit scope), updates a single rolling release PR with
version bumps + per-package CHANGELOG entries. Merging that PR cuts
per-package tags + GitHub releases.
CHANGELOG files seeded at v0.1.0 baseline:
- CHANGELOG.md (root)
- packages/<feature>/CHANGELOG.md (5 features)
Subsequent versions are appended by release-please from commit
history. Do not edit manually.
Visibility surfaces updated (every agent entry point):
- CLAUDE.md Read First + new "Versioning is hybrid" Key Conventions
bullet (with bump policy summary)
- AGENTS.md preamble - new "Releases:" callout alongside Commits
- docs/glossary.md - new Releasing section with 8 terms (Conventional
Commits, release-please, Hybrid versioning, Tag prefix, Rolling
release PR, Bump targeting, Pre-1.0 bump policy, Release-As trailer,
CHANGELOG.md)
- docs/README.md - guides tree updated with releasing.md
- .claude/hooks/session-start.sh - one-line release reminder
- .claude/hooks/prompt-context.sh - new keyword group for
release/version/bump/semver/tag prompts
Package.json version bumps:
- root: name "template" -> "template-vertical", version "0.1.0"
- packages/auth, blog, media, marketing-pages, navigation: "0.0.0" -> "0.1.0"
Root rename rationale: release-please tags use the package-name + the
component prefix; "template-vertical" matches the repo identity (and
the user's question preview).
First release-please PR after this lands will sweep all subsequent
post-baseline commits into 0.1.1 / 0.2.0 bumps as appropriate.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
112 lines
9.6 KiB
Markdown
112 lines
9.6 KiB
Markdown
# ADR-021 — Hybrid versioning + automated changelog via release-please
|
||
|
||
**Status:** Accepted
|
||
**Date:** 2026-05-13
|
||
**Builds on:** Conventional Commits convention (CLAUDE.md Key Conventions), ADR-019 (sandcastle agent orchestration)
|
||
|
||
## Context
|
||
|
||
Until this ADR the template had no versioning + no changelog. Every package shipped at `0.0.0`; there was no tag history, no "what changed since I forked this" answer, and no formal cadence for surfacing meaningful state changes.
|
||
|
||
Two pressures motivated wiring this up now:
|
||
|
||
1. **Conventional Commits had just been mandated** (visible across CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, session-start, and prompt-context hooks). Conventional commits are the substrate that automated versioning tools consume — leaving them unused would waste a free signal.
|
||
2. **The template is a fork target.** Downstream consumers need a version they can pin against ("I forked at v0.3.0, what's changed?") and a changelog they can diff.
|
||
|
||
The available tools fall in three families:
|
||
|
||
- **Changesets** (`@changesets/cli`) — contributors run `pnpm changeset` per PR; explicit semver intent. Higher friction; not needed when conventional commits are already mandated.
|
||
- **semantic-release** — fully automated from conventional commits; publishes on merge. Less control; monorepo support requires extra plumbing.
|
||
- **release-please** (Google) — parses conventional commits, opens a rolling release PR with bumps + CHANGELOG entries; merging the PR cuts tags + GitHub releases.
|
||
|
||
`release-please` is the natural fit: conventional commits are already enforced, and the "release PR" model gives a human approval gate without requiring per-commit changeset files.
|
||
|
||
The remaining design choice is **versioning scope**:
|
||
|
||
- **Single root version** — one CHANGELOG.md at the root; the whole template moves together. Simplest.
|
||
- **Per-package versions** — every `@repo/*` package versions independently; one CHANGELOG.md per package. Useful for published packages; we publish nothing today.
|
||
- **Hybrid** — root template version (for cross-cutting changes: docs, scripts, ci, generators, core packages) + per-feature versions (for `packages/<feature>/**` changes). One root CHANGELOG.md + one per feature. Decision boundary follows commit-path scoping.
|
||
|
||
## Decision
|
||
|
||
**1. Adopt `release-please` (Google) as the versioning + changelog substrate.** Configuration in `release-please-config.json` and `.release-please-manifest.json` at the repo root. The GitHub Action lives at `.github/workflows/release-please.yml` and runs on every push to `main`.
|
||
|
||
**2. Hybrid versioning scope.** Six tracked packages:
|
||
|
||
| Path | Package name | Component (tag prefix) | Initial version |
|
||
| -------------------------- | ----------------------- | ---------------------- | --------------- |
|
||
| `.` | `template-vertical` | `template` | `0.1.0` |
|
||
| `packages/auth` | `@repo/auth` | `auth` | `0.1.0` |
|
||
| `packages/blog` | `@repo/blog` | `blog` | `0.1.0` |
|
||
| `packages/media` | `@repo/media` | `media` | `0.1.0` |
|
||
| `packages/marketing-pages` | `@repo/marketing-pages` | `marketing-pages` | `0.1.0` |
|
||
| `packages/navigation` | `@repo/navigation` | `navigation` | `0.1.0` |
|
||
|
||
Each gets its own `CHANGELOG.md`. Tags use the per-package component prefix to avoid collisions: `template-v0.2.0`, `auth-v0.1.1`, etc.
|
||
|
||
Core packages (`core-shared`, `core-cms`, `core-api`, `core-eslint`, `core-typescript`, `core-testing`) and optional cores (`core-events`, `core-realtime`, etc., when scaffolded) are **NOT** independently versioned. Cross-cutting changes to those land in the root template version. Rationale: those packages cascade — bumping `core-shared` would functionally invalidate every feature anyway; surfacing them as separate versions creates noise without information. If a future consumer publishes individual core packages downstream, they can add per-package tracking then.
|
||
|
||
Apps (`web-next`, `web-tanstack`, `cms`, `storybook`) stay at `0.0.0`. They're not consumable artifacts.
|
||
|
||
**3. Pre-1.0 bump policy.** While each tracked package is `<1.0.0`:
|
||
|
||
- `feat:` commits bump **patch** (not minor), per `bump-patch-for-minor-pre-major: true`
|
||
- `fix:` commits bump patch
|
||
- `feat!:` (or any `BREAKING CHANGE:` footer) bumps **minor** (not major)
|
||
- `chore`, `ci`, `build`, `style`, `test` commits don't bump
|
||
|
||
Rationale: the conservative pre-1.0 default means surface area can change without exhausting the version space. When a package crosses `1.0.0`, standard semver kicks in.
|
||
|
||
**4. Conventional-commit type → changelog section mapping.** From `release-please-config.json`:
|
||
|
||
| Type | Section | Hidden |
|
||
| --------------------------------------- | ------------- | ------ |
|
||
| `feat` | Features | no |
|
||
| `fix` | Bug Fixes | no |
|
||
| `perf` | Performance | no |
|
||
| `refactor` | Refactoring | no |
|
||
| `docs` | Documentation | no |
|
||
| `revert` | Reverts | no |
|
||
| `test`, `chore`, `ci`, `build`, `style` | (omitted) | yes |
|
||
|
||
Hidden sections still drive version bumps where applicable (none do, by current policy) but don't clutter the changelog.
|
||
|
||
**5. Bump targeting is by commit-path, not commit-scope.** release-please decides which package(s) to bump based on the _files changed_ in a commit, NOT the conventional-commit `scope`. A commit changing `packages/auth/**` bumps `@repo/auth`; a commit changing `docs/**` or `scripts/**` or `CLAUDE.md` bumps the root template; a commit changing both bumps both. The conventional-commit `scope` field is for human readability in the changelog — it does not drive routing.
|
||
|
||
**6. Release PR is a rolling document.** Every push to main re-evaluates the open release PR. Merging it cuts tags + creates GitHub releases for each affected package. No manual edits to the PR — the changelog content is reproducible from the commit history.
|
||
|
||
**7. CHANGELOG files are committed and edited only by release-please.** Manual edits are discouraged because they will be overwritten the next time release-please assembles the rolling PR. Initial baseline content for each `0.1.0` entry is the only exception.
|
||
|
||
## Alternatives considered
|
||
|
||
- **Changesets (`@changesets/cli`)** — rejected primarily because Conventional Commits already capture the necessary intent. Per-PR changeset files would duplicate information. Could revisit if release-please ever fails to handle a release-shape edge case (e.g. needing a manual bump that's larger than commits imply).
|
||
- **semantic-release** — rejected for monorepo friction. Per-package support requires `semantic-release-monorepo` or `multi-semantic-release`; release-please handles this natively.
|
||
- **Single root version** — rejected because cross-cutting commits ARE a different kind of change from feature commits. A `fix(media): off-by-one in upload` shouldn't churn the root template version; a `refactor(coverage): unify L0 thresholds` shouldn't churn `@repo/auth`'s version. Separating gives consumers a finer-grained "what changed for me" signal.
|
||
- **Per-package for every workspace member (apps, core, tooling)** — rejected. Core packages cascade; bumping `core-shared` is effectively a template-wide change. Apps aren't consumable. Tooling churn is mostly mechanical. Adding versions for these adds bookkeeping without information value.
|
||
- **Tag prefix `template-vertical-v...` vs `template-v...`** — chose `template-v` for tag economy (shorter; consistent length with `auth-v`, `blog-v`, etc.). The package name `template-vertical` is still authoritative in `package.json`.
|
||
- **Auto-merge the release PR** — rejected. Human approval is the gate that catches the rare case where a commit's content doesn't match its conventional type (e.g. a `chore:` commit that actually shipped a feature).
|
||
|
||
## Consequences
|
||
|
||
**Positive:**
|
||
|
||
- Every merge to main produces a tracked, dated record of what changed for downstream consumers.
|
||
- Conventional commits become load-bearing: their type + body shape the changelog directly.
|
||
- The "what version did I fork at" question has a real answer per tracked package.
|
||
- Tagged releases enable `git diff vX.Y.Z..HEAD -- <path>` for narrow "what changed in feature X since I last looked" questions.
|
||
- Release cadence is implicit (merge the PR when ready); no separate release planning required.
|
||
|
||
**Negative:**
|
||
|
||
- Six packages × independent versions means six CHANGELOG.md files to navigate. Mitigated by the `## Cross-references` section in each pointing at the relevant ADRs + this one.
|
||
- release-please-action is GitHub-Actions-coupled. A migration to a different CI provider would need a different runner (the release-please core CLI runs anywhere, but the orchestration around the rolling PR is Action-specific).
|
||
- The first release PR after the initial baseline could be large (covers everything merged after `0.1.0`). This is one-time; subsequent PRs are scoped to the work between releases.
|
||
- Apps stuck at `0.0.0` is mildly confusing if a contributor expects every package to be versioned. Mitigated by documentation here + in `docs/guides/releasing.md`.
|
||
|
||
## Related
|
||
|
||
- ADR-019 — sandcastle agent orchestration (the dispatch loop that ships these commits)
|
||
- ADR-020 — coverage architecture (one of the systems shipped at the 0.1.0 baseline)
|
||
- CLAUDE.md Key Conventions — Conventional Commits requirement (the substrate this ADR consumes)
|
||
- `docs/guides/releasing.md` — day-to-day cookbook
|